Uso de una guía de punta flexible (FlexTip) para manejar el fallo del primer intento de intubación con el videolaringoscopio C-MAC D-Blade en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: serie prospectiva de casos / Use of a flexible tip bougie (FlexTip) in the management of the first-attempt failure intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope in the intensive care unit: A prospective, case series

Describimos una serie de 11 casos en los que hemos utilizado la nueva guía de punta flexible (FlexTip) como rescate tras el fallo de un primer intento de intubación con el videolaringoscopio C-MAC D-Blade en nuestra UCI. Durante un periodo de 16 meses se recogieron datos de todas las intubaciones donde se utilizó el videolaringoscopio C-MAC D-Blade. Noventa y un pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio, donde 79 (86,8%) fueron intubados al primer intento, 11 (12,1%) necesitaron 2 intentos, y un paciente necesitó 3 intentos. Entre los 12 pacientes que necesitaron más de un intento de intubación, en un paciente se utilizó una guía «Frova», y en el resto, la nueva guía de punta flexible (FlexTip). En la presente investigación observamos que la nueva guía de punta flexible (FlexTip) puede ser una buena opción para aquellos casos en los que con un videolaringoscopio no somos capaces de intubar en el primer intento.(AU)

We describe a series of 11 cases in which we used the new flexible tip (FlexTip) bougie as a rescue device following first-attempt failure at intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope in our UCI. We collected data from all intubations performed using the C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope over a 16-month period. Ninety six patients were included in the study: 79 (86.8%) were intubated at the first attempt; 11 (12.1%) required 2 attempts; and one patient required 3 attempts. The Frova Intubating Introducer was used in one of the 12 patients requiring more than one intubation attempt, and the FlexTip was used in the remaining 11. This study shows that the new FlexTip bougie is a good rescue device when the first attempt at video laryngoscope intubation fails.(AU)

Complicaciones y grado de dificultad de la intubación orotraqueal en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pre-post instauración de un protocolo de intubación para el paciente crítico. Estudio prospectivo y observacional / Complications and degree of difficulty of orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit before and after the establishment of an intubation protocol for critically ill patients: A prospective, observational study

Objetivo: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue comparar el grado de dificultad y las complicaciones relacionadas con la intubación orotraqueal en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI), pre y post instauración de un protocolo de intubación basado en la guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil específica para el paciente crítico, publicada en 2018 por la Difficult Airway Society (Reino Unido). Métodos: Estudio prospectivo, observacional, comparando todas las intubaciones realizadas en nuestra UCI en un periodo pre-protocolo (enero 2015-enero 2019) con un periodo post-protocolo (febrero 2019-julio 2022). Durante el procedimiento se registró el material utilizado para la intubación, el grado de dificultad de la intubación y las complicaciones asociadas. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio fueron intubados 661 pacientes: 437 en el periodo pre-protocolo (laringoscopia directa 96%) y 224 en el post-protocolo (laringoscopia directa 53%, videolaringoscopio 46%). En el periodo post-protocolo observamos una mejoría de la visión laringoscópica en comparación con el pre-protocolo (Cormack-Lehane ≥2b en el 7,6% vs 29,8%, p<0,001), y una disminución de las intubaciones calificadas de dificultad moderada-severa (6,7% vs 17,4%, p<0,001). La intubación al primer intento fue del 92,8% en el periodo post-protocolo frente al 90,2% pre-protocolo (p=0,508). No encontramos diferencias significativas en las complicaciones en los dos periodos estudiados. Conclusiones: Las intubaciones realizadas en el periodo post-protocolo se han asociado a una mejoría de la visión laringoscópica y a una menor dificultad de intubación en comparación con el periodo pre-protocolo.(AU)

Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the degree of difficulty and complications related to tracheal intubation in an intensive care unit (ICU) before and after the introduction of an intubation protocol based on the Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults, published in 2018. Methods: Prospective, observational study comparing all intubations performed in our ICU over two periods: pre-protocol (January 2015-January 2019) and post-protocol (February 2019-July 2022). The material used for intubation, the degree of difficulty, and intubation-related complications were recorded. Results: During the study period, 661 patients were intubated —437 in the pre-protocol period (96% by direct laryngoscopy) and 224 in the post-protocol period (53% with direct laryngoscopy, 46% with video laryngoscopy). We observed an improvement in laryngeal view in the post-protocol period compared to the pre-protocol period (Cormack-Lehane ≥2b in 7.6% vs 29.8%, P<.001), and a decrease in the number of moderate-to-severely difficult intubations (6.7% vs 17.4%, P<.001). The first-pass success rate was 92.8% in the post-protocol period compared to 90.2% pre-protocol (P=.508). We did not find significant differences in complications between the periods studied. Conclusions: Intubations performed in the post-protocol period were associated with improved laryngeal view and fewer cases of difficult intubation compared with the pre-protocol period.(AU)

Use of a flexible tip bougie (FlexTip) in the management of the first-attempt failure intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope in the intensive care unit: A prospective, case series.

We describe a series of 11 cases in which we used the new flexible tip (FlexTip) bougie as a rescue device following first-attempt failure at intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope in our UCI. We collected data from all intubations performed using the C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope over a 16-month period. Ninety six patients were included in the study: 79 (86.8%) were intubated at the first attempt; 11 (12.1%) required 2 attempts; and 1 patient required 3 attempts. The Frova Intubating Introducer was used in 1 of the 12 patients requiring more than 1 intubation attempt, and the FlexTip was used in the remaining 11. This study shows that the new FlexTip bougie is a good rescue device when the first attempt at video laryngoscope intubation fails.

Complications and degree of difficulty of orotracheal intubation in the Intensive Care Unit before and after the establishment of an intubation protocol for critically ill patients: a prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the degree of difficulty and complications related to tracheal intubation in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) before and after the introduction of an intubation protocol based on the Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults, published in 2018. METHODS: Prospective, observational study comparing all intubations performed in our ICU over 2 periods: pre-protocol (January 2015-January 2019) and post-protocol (February 2019-July 2022). The material used for intubation, the degree of difficulty, and intubation-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 661 patients were intubated - 437 in the pre-protocol period (96% by direct laryngoscopy) and 224 in the post-protocol period (53% with direct laryngoscopy, 46% with video laryngoscopy). We observed an improvement in laryngeal view in the post-protocol period compared to the pre-protocol period (Cormack-Lehane ≥ 2b in 7.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001), and a decrease in the number of moderate-to-severely difficult intubations (6.7% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001). The first-pass success rate was 92.8% in the post-protocol period compared to 90.2% pre-protocol (p = 0.508). We did not find significant differences in complications between the periods studied. CONCLUSIONS: Intubations performed in the post-protocol period were associated with improved laryngeal view and fewer cases of difficult intubation compared with the pre-protocol period.

Quality of life and persistent symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. A prospective observational study comparing ICU with non-ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are prone to develop persistent symptoms and to show reduced quality of life following hospital admission. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to a hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2020. The primary outcome was to compare health related quality of life and persistent symptoms six months after hospital admission, of COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission with those who did not. RESULTS: Among the 242 patients hospitalized during the defined period of time, 44 (18.2%) needed ICU admission. Forty (16.5%) patients died during hospital admission. Two hundred and two (83.5%) patients were discharged alive from the hospital. At six months, 183 (75.6%) patients completed the questionnaires (32 ICU patients and 151 non ICU patients). Ninety-six (52.4%) reported decreased quality of life and 143 (78.1%) described persistent symptoms. More ICU patients showed worsening of their quality of life (71.9% vs 43.7%, P=0.004). There were no differences in the proportion of patients with persistent symptoms between ICU and non ICU patients (87.5% vs 76.2%, P=0.159). ICU patients showed more frequently dyspnea on exertion (78.1% vs 47.7%, P=0.02), dyspnea on light exertion (37.5% vs 4.6%, P<0.001), and asthenia (56.3 vs 29.1, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of COVID-19 needing hospitalization had persistent symptoms and a decline in the quality of life. ICU patients referred a large decrease of their quality of life compared with non ICU patients.

Calidad de vida y síntomas persistentes tras hospitalización por COVID-19. Estudio observacional prospectivo comparando pacientes con o sin ingreso en UCI / Quality of life and persistent symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. A prospective observational study comparing ICU with non-ICU patients

Antecedentes/contexto: Existe una tendencia en los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 a desarrollar síntomas persistentes y a presentar una disminución en su calidad de vida tras el ingreso hospitalario. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo de pacientes con COVID-19 con ingreso hospitalario entre el 1 de marzo al 30 de abril de 2020. El objetivo primario fue comparar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la presencia de síntomas persistentes seis meses después del ingreso, comparando los pacientes que requirieron ingreso en UCI con los que no lo precisaron. Resultados: De los 242 pacientes hospitalizados durante el período de estudio, 44 (18,2%) necesitaron ingreso en UCI. Cuarenta (16,5%) pacientes fallecieron durante el ingreso hospitalario. Doscientos dos (83,5%) pacientes fueron dados de alta del hospital. A los seis meses, 183 (75,6%) pacientes completaron los cuestionarios (32 pacientes UCI y 151 pacientes no UCI). Noventa y seis (52,4%) refirieron disminución de la calidad de vida y 143 (78,1%) describieron síntomas persistentes. Un número mayor de pacientes de UCI mostraron un empeoramiento de su calidad de vida (71,9 vs. 43,7%, p = 0,004). No hubo diferencias en la proporción de pacientes con síntomas persistentes entre los pacientes con UCI y sin UCI (87,5 vs. 76,2%, p = 0,159). Los pacientes de UCI mostraron con mayor frecuencia disnea de esfuerzo (78,1 vs. 47,7%, p = 0,02), disnea de pequeños esfuerzos (37,5 vs. 4,6%, p < 0,001) y astenia (56,3 vs. 29,1%, p = 0,003). Conclusiones: Los supervivientes de COVID-19 que necesitaron hospitalización presentaron síntomas persistentes y un deterioro de su calidad de vida. Los pacientes de UCI refirieron una mayor disminución de su calidad de vida, en comparación con los pacientes que no precisaron UCI.(AU)

Background: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are prone to develop persistent symptoms and to show reduced quality of life following hospital admission. Methods: Prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to a hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2020. The primary outcome was to compare health related quality of life and persistent symptoms six months after hospital admission, of COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission with those who did not. Results: Among the 242 patients hospitalized during the defined period of time, 44 (18.2%) needed ICU admission. Forty (16.5%) patients died during hospital admission. Two hundred and two (83.5%) patients were discharged alive from the hospital. At six months, 183 (75.6%) patients completed the questionnaires (32 ICU patients and 151 non ICU patients). Ninety-six (52.4%) reported decreased quality of life and 143 (78.1%) described persistent symptoms. More ICU patients showed worsening of their quality of life (71.9 vs. 43.7%, P = 0.004). There were no differences in the proportion of patients with persistent symptoms between ICU and non ICU patients (87.5 vs. 76.2%, P = 0.159). ICU patients showed more frequently dyspnea on exertion (78.1 vs. 47.7%, P = 0.02), dyspnea on light exertion (37.5 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001), and asthenia (56.3 vs. 29.1, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Survivors of COVID-19 needing hospitalization had persistent symptoms and a decline in the quality of life. ICU patients referred a large decrease of their quality of life compared with non ICU patients.(AU)

[Quality of life and persistent symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. A prospective observational study comparing ICU with non-ICU patients]. / Calidad de vida y síntomas persistentes tras hospitalización por COVID-19. Estudio observacional prospectivo comparando pacientes con o sin ingreso en UCI.

Background: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are prone to develop persistent symptoms and to show reduced quality of life following hospital admission. Methods: Prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to a hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2020. The primary outcome was to compare health related quality of life and persistent symptoms six months after hospital admission, of COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission with those who did not. Results: Among the 242 patients hospitalized during the defined period of time, 44 (18.2%) needed ICU admission. Forty (16.5%) patients died during hospital admission. Two hundred and two (83.5%) patients were discharged alive from the hospital. At six months, 183 (75.6%) patients completed the questionnaires (32 ICU patients and 151 non ICU patients). Ninety-six (52.4%) reported decreased quality of life and 143 (78.1%) described persistent symptoms. More ICU patients showed worsening of their quality of life (71.9 vs. 43.7%, P = 0.004). There were no differences in the proportion of patients with persistent symptoms between ICU and non ICU patients (87.5 vs. 76.2%, P = 0.159). ICU patients showed more frequently dyspnea on exertion (78.1 vs. 47.7%, P = 0.02), dyspnea on light exertion (37.5 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001), and asthenia (56.3 vs. 29.1, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Survivors of COVID-19 needing hospitalization had persistent symptoms and a decline in the quality of life. ICU patients referred a large decrease of their quality of life compared with non ICU patients.

Complications during repeated tracheal intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. A prospective, observational study comparing the first intubation and the reintubation.

BACKGROUND AND GOAL OF THE STUDY: The goal of the study was to compare the incidence of complications, technical difficulty of intubation and physiologic pre-intubation status between the first intubation and reintubation performed on the same patient in an ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee of Galicia (Santiago-Lugo, code No. 2015-012). Due to the observational, noninterventional, and noninvasive design of this study, the need for written consent was waived by the ethics committee of Galicia. Patients requiring tracheal intubation and reintubation in the ICU were included in this prospective observational study. Main endpoint was to compare the incidence of complications, physiologic pre-intubation status, and the rate of technical difficulty of intubation between the first intubation and reintubation performed on the same patient in an ICU. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 504 patients were intubated in our ICU during the study period, and 82 (16%) required reintubation. There was no difference between the first intubation and reintubation regarding number of total complication (35% vs 33%; P = ,86), hypotension (24% vs 24%; P = 1), hypoxia (26% vs 26%; P = 1), esophageal intubation (1% vs 1%; P = 1), and bronchoaspiration (2% vs 1%; P = ,86). Physiologic pre-intubation status and technical difficulty of intubation did not differ between the first intubation and reintubation. CONCLUSIONS: In our ICU patients requiring tracheal reintubation, incidence of complications, physiologic pre-intubation status, and technical difficulty of intubation did not differ between the first intubation and reintubation.

Ultrasonidos en anestesia locorregional. Fundamentos de la técnica e identificación de nervios periféricos / No disponible

El uso de ultrasonidos en anestesia locorregional se está convirtiendo en un estándar en la práctica clínica habitual. Aumentan la seguridad y en índice de éxitos de los bloqueos, sin embargo y como todas las técnicas, tiene limitaciones evidentes, derivadas fundamentalmente de las limitaciones técnicas y artefactos en la imagen que los ultrasonidos pueden provocar. En este artículo revisamos los principios físicos en los que se basan los ultrasonidos, y analizamos sus posibilidades y limitaciones, así como la forma de explorar nervios periféricos (AU)

The use of ultrasounds is becoming a standard in the clinical practice of locoregional anesthesia. They increase the rate of successful blocks and improve their security, but the ultrasound shave limitations due technical principles and the possibility of artefacts in the image. In this paper we review the basics of the physics of ultrasonography, their possibilities and limitations and the use of ultrasonography in the location of peripherals nerves (AU)

De la infección a la sepsis. Parte II. Impacto genético / From infection to sepsis. Part II. Genetic impact

La sepsis continua siendo una de las causas fundamentales de muerte –posiblemente la más importante- en nuestro medio habitual de trabajo, puesto que frecuentemente los pacientes oncológicos, politraumatizados o con patología cardiovascular y neurológica, fallecen debido a un fallo multiorgánico secundario a una infección. No están claras, sin embargo, las razones por las que una infección evoluciona o no a sepsis y a fallo multiorgánico, aunque parece que los factores genéticos pueden ser muy importantes en esta evolución. En esta segunda parte de la revisión, pretendemos analizar la información más significativa sobre el impacto de algunos polimorfismos en el riesgo de sufrir una sepsis severa o shock séptico, y en la evolución de esta enfermedad una vez establecida (AU)

Sepsis is still one of the major causes of death, maybe the most important one in our work environment, where our oncologic, polytraumatized, neurologic, or cardiac patients often die due to a multiorganic failure secondary to an infection. However, the reason for the evolution from infection to sepsis or even multiorganic failure remain unclear –although genetic factor can be very important developing this clinical condition. In the second part of this review we pretend to analyze the most significant information about the impact of some polymorphisms, involved in the risk of developing severe sepsis or septic shock, and their outcome when established (AU)

De la infección a la sepsis. Parte I. Mecanismos de inmunidad y daño tisular / From infection to sepsis. Part I. Immunologic mechanisms and tisular damage

La sepsis continúa siendo una de las causas fundamentales de muerte –posiblemente la más importante– en nuestro medio habitual de trabajo, puesto que frecuentemente los pacientes oncológicos, politraumatizados o con patología cardiovascular y neurológica fallecen debido a un fallo multiorgánico secundario a una infección. No están claras, sin embargo, las razones por las que una infección evoluciona o no a sepsis y a fallo multiorgánico. En esta revisión, que hemos dividido en dos partes, no pretendemos profundizar ni en la clínica ni el tratamiento de la sepsis, pretendemos revisar los conceptos fisiopatológicos implicados en la protección y daño celulares y tisulares. En la segunda parte prestaremos una especial dedicación a la información existente en la actualidad sobre la implicación de algunos genes en el pronóstico de estos enfermos (AU)

Sepsis is still one of the major causes of death, maybe the most important one in our work environment, where our oncologic, polytraumatized, neurologic, or cardiac patients often die due to a multiorganic failure secondary to an infection. However, the reasons for the evolution from infection to sepsis or even multiorganic failure remain unclear. In this two part review we don’t pretend to go into the clinical presentation and treatment of sepsis in depth, but to look through the physiopathologic features involved in cellular and tisular damage and protection. Moreover, in the second part we will pay special attention to the existing information about the role of certain genes in the outcome of these patients (AU)